For universities and schools
AI Detection Software for Academic Institutions
Give faculty and integrity teams a consistent way to review AI-written text, inspect sentence-level signals, and move document sets through a human-led process.
Why the workflow matters
A campus needs a review process, not another percentage.
A document score can tell a reviewer where to begin. It cannot interpret assignment rules, writing history, accommodations, drafts or student context. Proofademic keeps the result granular and portable so a person can complete the review.
Document estimateSentence-level signalsHuman context
A review path people can follow
Move from submission sets to reviewable cases.
See the flagged text, check the context, and use your judgment.
- 01Collect
Bring papers into a document queue.
- 02Scan
Check AI writing and source overlap separately.
- 03Inspect
Open the sentences behind the result.
- 04Review
Apply assignment context and institutional policy.
- 05Record
Export a PDF or share the report.
The reviewer found that several passages share a predictable cadence and low variation. Those passages should be read alongside the surrounding document and available drafting context.
Reporting and handoff
Give the next reviewer more than a screenshot.
A report can carry the overall result, sentence-by-sentence analysis and highlighted document text into a conversation or internal record. Share links make the same result viewable without flattening it into a single number.
See the AI detector workflow →
Designed for the real setting
Built around faculty judgment and institutional policy.
Use detection as one input in a documented process. Proofademic is designed to help reviewers inspect a signal, not declare misconduct automatically.
Review the research and methodology →Tools for this workflow
Choose the right tool for the review.
Research and guidance
Use detection with context, privacy and care.
01
AI Content Detection · Sep 2026
Pangram AI detector review: How it works, how accurate it is, and how it compares to Proofademic
Is Pangram AI Detector accurate? See what our tests found, its limitations, false-positive concerns, pricing, & how it compares with Proofademic for…
Read the article →02
AI Content Detection · Sep 2026
Is Undetectable AI Legit for Academic Work? An Honest Review
Read this honest Undetectable AI review covering detection accuracy, humanizer testing, pricing, limits, and how far it can be trusted for academic…
Read the article →03
AI Content Detection · Sep 2026
QuillBot AI Detector Review: Is It Accurate Enough for Academic Use?
We stress-tested QuillBot AI detector on four samples. It flagged AI academic writing at 95% but scored AI creative writing at 0%.…
Read the article →Institutions FAQ
Questions from institutions.
Yes. Batch Scan is available for document sets. The appropriate volume and rollout can be discussed for an institutional workflow.
No. Results are estimates and should be reviewed alongside policy, assignment context, drafts, source use and other relevant information.
Yes. Completed results can be exported as a print-ready PDF or shared through a viewable report link.
Yes. Reviewers can inspect the passages that contribute to the document-level result rather than relying only on one percentage.
The developer platform provides AI text and image detection APIs. Integration scope should be reviewed with the institution and the official API documentation.
The next step
Plan a review workflow your faculty can explain.
Talk with us about Batch Scan, report handling, API access and the way Proofademic can fit your institution’s existing review process.